Exapataō! How Private Interpretation & Sex Sells


There are two passages in the bible that dumbfounds false teachers near and far…

“Knowing this first, that no prophecy of the scripture is of any private interpretation…“- 2nd Peter 1:20

“As also in all his epistles, speaking in them of these things; in which are some things hard to be understood, which they that are unlearned and unstable wrest, as they do also the other scriptures, unto their own destruction” – 2nd Peter 3:16

Has anyone put forth with success more private interpretations and religious speculation as truth than Shepherd’s Chapel? You see, one of things our teacher likes to do is reinterpret the whole of scripture through the lens of his IDOL DOCTRINE the SERPENT SEED and it’s attendant KENITE deception. He knows no bounds to bending and twisting the text to make it fit his precious lies.

Take for instance where he tells us that the Greek word expatao or beguiled in Corinthians means to wholly seduce, as in both sexually and spiritually.

“For I am jealous over you with godly jealousy: for I have espoused you to one husband, that I may present you as a chaste virgin to Christ. But I fear, lest by any means, as the serpent beguiled Eve through his subtlety, so your minds should be corrupted from the simplicity that is in Christ.” 2nd Corinthians 11:2-3

“You will remember also that, uh…  Paul, in second Corinthians chapter eleven verses two and three stated, “I wanna present you all as chaste virgins to Christ,” that is to say our husband, when he returns, “not as Eve who was beguiled by that serpent.”  The word beguiled in the Greek being, “Expattio”  which has only one meaning, and that is to be wholly seduced, uh.   Documentation?  Prove me out.  A Strong’s concordance, the Greek word 1818, beguiled as it is used in second Corinthians chapter 11.” – Arnold Murray, tape #438 Mark of the Beast

For Murray this text is about how Satan sexually seduced Eve in the Garden. At the same time he is suggesting that the antichrist will do to the church during the tribulation what Satan did to Eve in the garden. How that works I do not know. Somehow when Christ comes back he will find the church with a corporate devil baby.

I’m being facetious but you can see what happens when you logically follow these things out. In other words, Antichirst (or Satan according to Murray) is going to have sex with the church spiritually. OK, sure.

Expatao has absolutely nothing to do with being seduced sexually. The word simply means to be deceived and that is what happened to Eve – she allowed the serpent to deceive her through his subtlety into disobeying God. Sex never entered the picture – but like I said before, carnal man responds to this type of sensual perverse nonsense.


The main reasons I bring this up is to show you how false teachers distort and pervert the text making it mean something that is an utter abomination. Eve never had sexual relations with Satan and the word expatao has nothing to do with sexual seduction and means simply to deceive.


Author: Timothy Campbell

Independent researcher exposing Joel's Army / Latter-Rain Movement, Christian evangelist and helping to expose the plot of the ages - the church will be here during the great tribulation (or Golden Age of Gaia) and will have resist the beast and his mark...

65 thoughts on “Exapataō! How Private Interpretation & Sex Sells”

  1. Being beguiled is a nice feeling: it means you are totally absorbed by something in an enjoyable way. You can be beguiled by a sporting event, a movie, or a concert. You could be beguiled by another person who is attractive or clever. When you’re beguiled, you like what you see so much that you can’t take your eyes off it — almost like being in a trance.
    So then are we all descendants of Adam and Eve?


      1. No we did not all come from eve and adam, and if this so why do you not find cain’s family history. No we find seths, because he was form them. But there was a 6th day creation then rest. On the 8th day God created adam and eve. Futher in the bible it speaks of cain and his father the devil.


      2. That is not true. This whole site is a ruse by Lucifer’s minions to undermine the real word of God. You would do well to listen to Pastor Murray go through the Bible Chapter by Chapter and Verse by Verse. But Noooo…it’s too easy to google the Demon’s twisted writings. May God have Mercy on you all.


    1. if being holy seduced spiritually and physically as Adam and Eve were is your thing I wish you well but I’m afraid you do not have the eyes to see and the ears to hear God’s warning. All races are not from adam and eve in the garden for Cain, Satans offspring through eve was removed from the Garden of Eden in yet he found a wife and had his own offspring we call the Kenites. Secondly, the antichrist (Lucifer) is not going to have sex with the church for that is not fair to anyone that you have mis-interpreted this. He simply will rule over it claiming to be God and the church system will bow to him thinking they are worshipping there God. This is the trap you must avoid. Whether you believe in God or not, whether you call yourself a Christian or not, wheth
      er you believe in the rapture or not, whether you believe you are in good standings with God your father or not, the bible clearly states over and over again that if you love God you are not to worship a false God. Instead of attacking a fellow Christian who only wants you to believe whatever you will and comit one way or the other. elisiah in the last days purpose is to turn the hearts of all God’s children back to the FATHERS (God or Lucifer) That was his mission in my opinion. I see NO FAULT in him. I find no fault in you if your trying to love God. I pray you find your way and try not to judge those who believe different then you. God Bless… Boaz ….


    2. Genesis 1 26 And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth.


  2. If sex wasnt an issue then why did they cover their private parts (as we call), and not the mouth from eating an apple. I learned to count to 8 , so I understand the 8th day creations. You need to understand cain was not the son of adam, but he was what the bible teaches us the first murderer. He killed his twin brother who was fathered by different tather. And if you dont think that can happen ask a doctor.


      1. Yeah, the text also says that Adam knew (had sex) Eve his wife and conceived – as a result of that conception Cain was born. I like how they blatantly read past the clear intentional meaning of the scripture in favor of something gnostic that only Murray and his followers know and can reveal. Cain was Adam’s literal child… were the serpent seed true, Eve should have said, “I have gotten a man from the serpent.”


      2. To E below. Before addressing you’re translation issues, what schooling or training do you have in biblical hebrew. I can see that you’re using Arnold Murray and a lexicon, but what further training have you received? I ask so I know how to tailor my reply.


      3. Well, at this point in a discussion I just began reading E has systematically destroyed the logic of your argument and the only response I’ve seen from Thomas Campbell the ‘scholar’ or Craig. I’m now very interested Craig to see if you be a man of Honor and rather than use Standard Socialist doctrine for overcoming arguments, attack character and if that does not work make something up.
        Craig, in this case it’s not a simple political discussion, it’s His Living Word, and our ‘studied and rightly dividing of same.
        E, you have done your work in building line upon line and precept upon precept and quite well. Craig? Mr. Campbell? Hello? Your Honor awaits.


  3. Cain was Adams son. Moses married a Kenite. Seems students of this teaching always use John chapter eight but Jesus begins and ends that saying with acknowledging he was speaking to the seed of Abraham.

    To fully believe this doctrine one must go all the way and say Moses was deceived by the kenites himself. Kenites are the ones he stayed with I’m between his exile from Egypt and the exodus.

    Just because Cain and kenites has the same root in the Hebrew language means nothing. The son and city of Cain was Enoch (Chanok) not kenite..furthermore, there is an Enoch in Genesis totally different from the Enoch of Cain.

    I appreciate your respect towards the scriptures as opposed to men. Be blessed. 🙂


    1. Brian, Moses did not get married to a cainite. First of all, his mother and father are levites pertaining to the priest line. Exodus chapter 2 verse 1. When reading chapter 18 verse 1 & 2 you will find out that his wife is
      a Midian, because her father Jethro is a son of Abraham. Strong’s concordance numbers 3503, 3500 and 4080 in the hebrew text. Midian=blood line of Abraham.


  4. Yeah, I agree..the whole teaching is from one gnostic gospel and Kabbala, that should be enough to see right there..then there is the fact that you pointed out well, absolutely no biblical support..this doctrine fights against proper understanding of many things including Moses, Peter and most importantly Jesus own teachings of the flood..it contorts understanding certain prophecies and leads easily to division and certainly false judgment..even the words “synagogue of satan”is changed to mean”kenite”by this group..

    They change sons of satan into sons of Cain..the scripture relates Korah the same as Cain spiritually but we know Korah was a Levite and not a kenite. It’s clearly staying they are of the devil by spirit not sperm as we know all the nations after the flood are from one blood..


    1. Susan from arkansas, I am someone who agrees with you one hundred percent. 1 john chapter 3 , verse 11 and 12. Not as Cain, who was of that wicked one, and slew his brother. Because his works were evil. also, Susan is right about the 6th day creation and the 8th day creation. Let us read it with clearity. Genesis chapter 3, 14 and 15 And I ” God” will put enmity between thee and the Women, and between thy seed and her seed; it shall bruise thy head, and thou shalt bruise his heel. This relates to the birth of christ, Isaiah chapter 9 verse 6. For unto us a child is born, ” bruising of the devil’s head”; unto us a son is given: and the government shall be upon his shoulder: and his name shall be called Wonderful, Counsellor. The mighty God, the everlasting Father. Satan was trying to stop the birth of christ threw Cain’s blood line! Seth was the replacement for Abel’s blood line. Genesis chapter 4 verse 25. Genesis chapter 5 The descendants of Adam. Cain does not exist at all. It had taken God 7,000 years to creat everything plus 1,000 years of rest. ” 2 Peter chapter 3 verse 8 But, beloved, be not ignorant of this one thing, that one day is with the Lord as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day.


      1. “And Adam lived an hundred and thirty years, and begat a son in his own likeness, after his image; and called his name Seth: 4 and the days of Adam after he had begotten Seth were eight hundred years: and he begat sons and daughters: 5 and all the days that Adam lived were nine hundred and thirty years: and he died.” (Gen 5:3-5) Then what are we to make of the unnumbered and unmentioned sons and daughters if they are never given a genealogy in the Bible.


    2. Brian, the first earth age was destoyed leaving the earth totally ingulfed in water. Genesis chapter 1 verses
      1 & 2. Why? Because of the war in heaven between Lucifer and God + one third of the fallen angels. 2 Peter chapter 3 vers. 3 threw 7 will back this up! verse 4 is going against the second earth age starting 6,000 years ago with Adam. please read with clearity. “”” for since the fathers fell asleep, all things continue as they were from the beginning of the creation. Not to mention one day for God is a thousand years for us. 2 peter chapter 3 vers 8. Having said this, Noah’s flood did not ingulf the whole world. Therefore, There were peoples in certain locations of the world. Also a second influx of fallen angels trying to stop the blood line of christ. During the time of King David.


      1. Aloha Ray,
        I have come to the realization that posting any response to Tim C’s info is tantamount to getting a direct answer from the President’s Press Secretary. He has no scriptural back-up to support the rants, therefore it’s not quite worth the time taken thus far I believe.

        In order to read and understand Tim’s viewpoint I guess you just need to believe that Cain was perhaps afraid of his younger sister, or a baby brother when he was forced out of the garden.

        Aloha, have a wonderful day in France.


    1. I have never once set foot within such a denomination as you mentioned – I’m southern baptist, so you have mistook me for someone else. That church you mentioned is apostate like roman Catholicism and I don’t affiliate with it.


  5. So Eve was essentially saying, “Thanks God, for this hell spawn whom I sired from having sexual relations with an angelic entity – this child will start a race that will unleash total devastation upon the world, thanks God.”

    I learned this tripe over 20 years ago – the Holy Spirit convicted me of it and I had to unlearn it… if you’re having trouble unlearning this religious idolatry ask God for help.

    So you are using this one word “eth” to somehow prove Cain was literal progeny of Satan – much the same way you use “eth” to prove that Adam is a separate creation from the 6th day races?

    Eve bore THE Cain. How do you read anything else into that I don’t know. It could also read, “Eve bore the person Cain” or “Eve bore the man Cain” but I’m sure that mundane interpretation wouldn’t fit with your religious fantasy.

    The Kenites mentioned later in scripture are of no connection with Cain. I will make my next article on shattering this very premise. Should be fun for you.


  6. To E. I stated why I asked you for your credentials, so that I could tailor an answer appropriate to your level of training. You have no formal training in Biblical Hebrew, and that necessitates a different approach than someone who has a year more of education in Biblical Hebrew. You asked for my credentials and so I shall provide them. I have an undergraduate degree in Bible and Theology from an accredited university and have over 30 hrs of seminary training at accredited schools. I also have two years of Biblical Greek training. So you and I are on the same level of Biblical Hebrew training, none. I do however know to beware the root word fallacy. As an accomplished linguist, I say without sarcasm, you should know better than to run a word down to its core, etymologically, before attempting a translation.


    1. E. You are conflating my words with the words of some other Mr. Campbell. Mr. Bullinger, God rest his soul – taught many things that led Arnold Murray astray. If the rhetoric seems mean just know this – I was once deeply enmeshed in this cult and Jesus Christ delivered me… I have a searing hatred for false religion, not for the people who are trapped in it and am grasping for words to jolt them out of their trance.


    2. Excuse me Craig, where oh where is any semblance of Scholarship in this response. Excuse me, 30 hours? uh, 15 days at 2 hours a day perhaps? I’m duly impressed. Perhaps your time was not completely wasted, let’s see you dazzle us with your complete understanding. Your audience awaits, surely you would not wish to disappoint everyone.
      Now that we know why you asked for E’s credentials, as you were much too humble to humiliate the writer if his non-accredited views were not up to the weight of your lofty response. He may be ‘slain in his spirit’ So, now that we have all the introductions out of the way, and the slate is clean, let’s start the debate.

      Craig, how about it? Show us your stuff. Take ‘any’ of the multitudinous questions that have been directed at both you and ‘the scholar’ and pick it apart as yours have been dissected. Enough of the banter, let’s see your SCHOLARSHIP? just a smidgen of your herculean grasp on the lexicon of His Word, we stand transfixed and awaiting something ‘solid’.

      on the edge of my seat,


  7. Aloha E,
    Thank you so much for your very thoughtful and well constructed responses, they are not only spot on but if wisdom is the ability to translate complex ideas and information into a readily available thought form which anyone can understand, this is true wisdom. As a long time student of SC and many other ‘true men and women of God’ your synopsis is spot on. Thank you for expressing it.
    As for the author of this series of blogs I would classify as ‘certain men who crept in unaware, pre-ordained for this condemnation’ however the Lord is merciful.

    Nice work E


    1. The author of this blog is a born again, blood bought member of the body of Christ. The author of this blog was once convicted of his sins of religious idolatry for being affiliated with Shepherd’s Chapel. The author of this blog by the grace of God will continue to testify against this cult because he is called to do that.


  8. Mr. Campbell,
    I mistakenly called you Tom, forgive me this was my error. I am not a scholar simply a student, and have no credentials, only a smattering of common sense (from the Lord and none of my doing) with that said, I have witnessed from ‘E’ a very concise and thoroughly researched, referenced, argument in favor of Pastor Murray, and a great number of direct questions asked. Both you and Craig have been asked repeatedly to and patiently to ‘please answer the questions, yes?

    Thus far I have witnessed absolutely no scholarship or logically based retort, no substantial effort of any kind to refute the subject matter, only an obvious effort to dodge the questions and obfuscate the issues with circular argument. We all understand that you are ‘born again’ and saved blessed be the Lord for His grace and mercy.
    As for Craig, he takes the CNN,MSNBC mind control tactic (which I am sure he uses unconsciously) of attacking the orator rather than the logic of the argument, again never getting around to ‘ANSWERING ANY OF THE QUESTIONS’

    So, with your illumined viewpoint and vast understanding, and that of Craig, it would be simply wonderful if you would take a bit of time and simply ‘point out E’s error using the vast knowledge you claim to have’ and as it is your blog, perhaps do it in the same format as E has done. I have seen his format as easy to follow and he uses the scriptures to back up his viewpoint. It would be great if you could do the same, or perhaps Craig as he has an Under Graduate Degree so has no doubt done this many times.

    You have now been asked, by two readers of your article to give a thorough, thoughtful, response to ANY of E’s arguments, pick one……………please.

    Remember, this is NOT an political discussion, or a case of ‘who let the air out of the football’ this is HIS word, and HIS truth you are discussing, not a subject one should take lightly knowing the implications of being ‘willingly ignorant’

    Thank you so much for your efforts, no need to reply immediately, it takes time and effort to do the research, which you are no doubt aware. Look forward to seeing your results.



    1. I have dealt with the serpent seed doctrine on this blog in much detail – E is arguing in favor of false doctrines I have refuted over and over here on this site. He is committed to his error – I don’t need to keep wrangling with him over it. If there is anything specific you want me to address, say on.


      1. Gosh, do tell, I’m sure there are some new readers such as me, or are your past arguments as simple and illogical as I’ve seen presented, I am just being straightforward with you.

        Ok, tell me this, A) who did Nimrod build the cities for and with if the flood was worldwide? Or, how is it that Ancient Chinese History records the flood in the Tavian basin? Did one guy survive and decide to write a list of Ancient Kings as his first To Do? Same with the Egyptian History or take the Sumerian Kings list that lists the reigns of kings back to thousands of years before the flood.

        OR THIS< explain the words of Christ to the Scribes advising that Abraham is not their father, if we all came from Adam and Eve then who would we need to 'come out from among them and be ye separate?

        Or, how about this, explain anything to the depth and using scriptures as E has done, I surmise you cannot.


      2. https://shepherdschapel.wordpress.com/2015/01/19/do-you-want-to-know-who-the-kenites-really-were/

        a) how many years from the flood to Nimrod? You assume that there weren’t enough people from 8. If the flood wasn’t global then God is lying in the book of Genesis. There is actual scientific evidence that corroborates with the flood story. Chinese history is a derivation of the original event. Not certain about the list of kings but I’m certain it doesn’t overrule the testimony of scripture.

        b) Abraham not the father of Pharisees. You contend they descend literally from Cain. These jews were physical descendants from Abraham, but not spiritual – and this is what Christ was referring to.

        Neither, because they are the seed of Abraham, are they all children: but, In Isaac shall thy seed be called. That is, They which are the children of the flesh, these are not the children of God: but the children of the promise are counted for the seed. – Romans 9:7-8

        Does that make sense?

        c) see article link

        d) Any new information that E presents I can assure you will be dealt with – I only have so much patience and energy to devote to refuting the Kenite doctrine. I know it’s thoroughly from the pit of hell… but I promise you this – I have dealt and will continue to deal extensively refuting it. I promise 🙂


  9. After taking some time digesting the threads created by many respondents:
    I’ve taken the time to do an assessment Re: your retort responses when you become overwhelmed with
    responders who present relevant questions to your less than scholarly posted statements.

    I have several published research works on bible prophecy and related end times subjects.
    So whether that qualifies me to post this comment is exclusive your call.
    Moreover: I’m sure you will disagree with this objective analysis

    1) It appears that you have a table of quick terse responses which when confronted with too many relevant questions you either refrain from answering because your too lazy to do the research or cant successfully defend your position using scripture… choosing instead to simply select a predetermined response
    2) I must agree with JC from Maui that you have deceptively used what appears to be alternate chat pseudonym to support your lack of scholarship effort to discredit SC teaching.
    3) Your page is what I will identify… not as a Blog but rather a Slog which has all the earmarks of being a paid Illuminati disinformation troll site and that you sir… are nothing more than a Babylonian (confusion) Stooge.
    You really should find an alternative career which is truly constructive with which to apply your writing talents.. as you are way over your head in this endeavor..!

    I will not close this time with Yahweh Bless but rather
    My the God of the Bible judge you on your works..!
    In closing: I don’t expect to see this analysis posted to the thread… and if that be the case
    it will incontrovertibly confirm my stated assertions


    1. Hi Mr. Ad Hominem.

      Let me address your points as tersely as possible…

      1) Most comments on this blog are personal attacks and present no points at all. My predetermined responses? What, like, the Shepherd’s Chapel is a cult? Or, a false religion?
      2) Alternate chat pseudonym? You are starting to sound kooky – I haven’t been in a chatroom since the 90’s.
      3) Paid illuminati disinfo troll? That’s way too funny. I can’t take you serious now, how do I know you aren’t trolling? I was a former Shepherd’s Chapel disciple – the Lord Jesus Christ delivered me this cult. You should be thrilled. If you understood what this blog was about you would jump for joy. That’s what this blog is about – helping people see past this false religion.


      1. AGAIN, no solid BIBLICAL response, just the same tripe and character attacks it’s like watching CNN. You have nothing Mr. Campbell, this has become glaringly obvious. Or, if you do, then stop the ‘BS BANTER and answer the questions. Please enlighten us all as to the error of biblical interpretation as posed by E or ? I guess admit that you cannot justify your False Teaching remarks, yes? At this point, with you posting absolutely no Chapter and Verse response or the subsequent original meanings of the words in question, nor, bothering after numerous invitations to please provide this to back up your claims you are unable to do so.
        Talk about taking someone seriously, you are simply full of your OWN BELIEFS because A) there is no truth found in you or B) you do not agree with the Lord ; oh, pardon me, that is redundant. Well, let’s just leave it at this, you have no scriptural basis for your arguments, nor do you attempt to provide any, hence you are NOT WORTH LISTENING TO as you are without knowledge and puffed up on your own beliefs.
        Gosh, at least admit that Cain wasn’t afraid of his sister, but then that is simply asking too much.
        I agree, may the Lord judge you on your works. fortunately for you His mercy endureth forever.


      2. Character attacks? Like calling Murray a heretic and false teacher? I stand by remarks (as does the bible)

        You don’t accept what the scripture says. If you did then we wouldn’t be talking about serpent seed/Kenites which is such a colossal set of false teachings that I get sick whenever I run into another person that believes it. Anyone teaching these things is a false teacher. E believes that Satan had sex with Eve and spired a race of Kenites. Then E goes on to present all the information that I learned from Murray over 20 years ago as if I were uninformed about it – but I have made it clear that I know and believed at one time everything the Chapel taught and have dealt with it on this site.

        You don’t accept what the scripture says, that Adam and Eve were the first people God created and that everyone has descended from them. Cain married one the daughters of Adam and Eve. There are no other possibilities.


    2. ……………………….. the ball lays ‘in play’, on your side of the court Mr. Campbell or Craig, whomsoever would like to step up. Hmmm, perhaps the Equipment Manager neglected to fill the ball properly, it seems completely flat on your side.


      1. I already played ball on this one – but I will go back through E’s arguments and see if there’s anything to respond to. I let him speak, I don’t have to comment and respond to everything posted on the blog. I’m free to let the previous posts say anything that I feel needs to said.


  10. A religious organization teaching heresies = cult. As far as disparaging remarks towards Bullinger I don’t recall making any. I alluded to him as a false teacher who misled Murray. He was obviously a very astute theologian but this makes him all the more dangerous.

    I am weary of the Kenite doctrine.

    “Now Heber the Kenite had separated himself from the Kenites, from the sons of Hobab the father-in-law of Moses, and had pitched his tent as far away as the oak in Zaanannim, which is near Kedesh.” Judges 4:11

    Kenites here are associated with the sons of Hobab whose father was Jethro. Jethro was a Midianite – therefore Kenites were a subsection of the Midianite.


    You have been completely misled by Murray.


  11. I was a member of the Shepherd’s Chapel cult, i.e. I believed his teaching wholeheartedly and was in agreement with him. You don’t have to be in a Jim Jones compound to be in a cult. Assuredly, there are different types of cults but their essence is the same — heretical and damnable doctrines are being taught. Islam = cult. Roman Catholicism = cult. Shepherd’s Chapel = cult. FALSE RELIGION.


  12. So, when Peter in his epistle called the liars in his day false prophets and/or false teachers he was guilt of defamation or character assassination? Or when Paul accuses the coppersmith by name of causing him harm, that was malicious gossip? This is laughable because in your estimation if someone were misleading someone you could make no mention of it. And that’s the way all of Murray’s follower would have it, wouldn’t they? They are committed to their error, why would they want someone to highlight this for them? I have made no disparaging remark. If I have been critical, it’s according to scripture.


  13. After looking through the multiple pages of ‘your opinions’ on this site Mr. Campbell, I am tending also to believe that this is your FULL TIME JOB, who does pay you for this? The strange thing is, it’s almost entirely comprised of blasts against A. Murray and SC? What pray tell is your agenda Mr. Campbell?

    One must surmise that you do have an agenda, and it is not in the least a positive one. You are not bringing anyone out of Cults, you can do nothing. “He who has begun a good work in me will continue it until the day of the Lord” and your name is not mentioned in this verse. My spirit bares witness to me that you are only playing to your own agenda, and your own tune, and there is no spirit in you, none of His truth that I have witnessed. You actually dare to show a picture of a pig and then talk about the Living God on one of your ‘rants’ about Ishtar/Easter, you have no scholarship and you do not have the spirit of the Lord in you, no matter what your claim.
    May the Lord God Almighty, the Creator of Heaven and Earth and the Lion of the
    Tribe of Judah ‘wake as out of a sleep, and like a mighty man that shouteth by reason of wine’.and bring swift balance and HIS judgment to your work on this site.


    1. I’m sorry – but you’re drunk on Murray’s doctrine. For you to say I don’t have God’s Spirit is wrong. I know what I was saved from. And as far as helping people out of cults, God actually uses our testimony and that is what I consider this blog to be: one tremendous testimony of what Jesus Christ has delivered me from. Am I perfect in every word and thought? No. The point made in the Easter article is valid. Peter was arrested during the feast of unleavened bread – which is AFTER the jewish Passover.


    1. The bible uses hyperbole, no? The only bible I have is a Companion bible, large print. I keep it handy to view Bullinger’s notes and to stimulate thoughts for articles on this blog. What did Jesus say, a little leaven leavens the whole lump. If you’re spiritually mature enough to discern from the truth and fiction of Bullinger’s notes, sure keep it. It ends up being a stumbling block, as do many study bibles. Should we quit using them? No, some good ones help clarify the meaning of the text. Bullinger does a good job in places… my point in writing the article about Bullinger is to highlight the fact teaches some serious error and that Murray picked those up and developed colossal system of fantasy religion based on it.


  14. Yes, I agree E, I have had enough of this Shrew, he’s totally undeserving of the time it takes to respond to his blather. I find Mr. Camp Baal to be someone who’s crept in unawares and has forsaken the truth.
    ‘having once received the truth have you exchanged His truth for lies?’
    Enough of this garbage, no need to reply to this Mr. C. your words are a tinkling brass. go back to your pigs and Easter bunnies as that makes sense to you.


    1. Yes, I like bunnies – and bacon. I have a question about Easter. Peter was arrested during the feast of unleavened bread which is after the Passover. Herod intended to keep him in prison until after the Passover – but the Passover had already passed. What is going on there? By the way, pagan Easter was celebrated late in April – which would have been AFTER the Passover.


  15. To be honest E I haven’t gone through your comments in depth. I have read some of it. Your position is the serpent seed/Kenite a lot of which I have covered but since you want a response I will work through it this week. I am amazed that anyone can believe this teaching but there are quite a few. I find it be an hideous interpretation of scripture, as bad as they come.

    It refutes itself honestly – maybe that is why I haven’t taken interest in your questioning.

    I was a student of the Chapel for quite some time, a very ardent one. When the Lord began to deal with me over this whole thing the scriptural insight that I thought that I had became a chimera. I believed as reality all the things I refute on this blog.

    It was a disconcerting time in my life. I’m happy that it’s over – I feel for anyone caught up deception. It distracts people from their walk with God. I am genuinely angry at teachers like Murray – not so much at Bullinger. Bullinger’s errors don’t carry the malignancy of Murray’s.


  16. Mr Cambell…
    I have spent quite some time reading all of your writings along with the responses.
    I have watched the televised programs of the Shephards Chapel.
    I happened on this blog because I was going to order some material from the program.
    What I want to say is…. Keep up your fight for the truth, it will be evident.. Truth always wins, either right now or later.
    I read some of these obvious scholars beating your remarks but know that those reading your responses will see the truth in all of the words spoken, either by you or your responders.
    Jesus told us about the wisdom of man, and I believe that his word is not confusing but enlightening.
    All these so called scholars will be shone for who they represent.
    Jesus’s words are not for the elite, but for us all..
    At the end of the day, weather you can identify a noun or adjective in Greek, Hebrew, Latin, Aramaic…. Or any other language, truth will come out if you read Gods word.
    His word is for us all and all we need to do is read it and ask for clarification from the Holy Spirit and we all can be givin the truth.
    We can all agree that in the end, all true believers will have there names written in the book of life.
    Keep speaking the truth.


    1. thanks David – I will continue to produce articles against the Chapel in the future, the Lord has called me to it. I took some time away from it because I’ve really tapped this theme out and my audience is quite negative. Not a whole lot of praise and adulation on this blog. I do have some more good content left to get out and maybe reworking some of the old articles… I look forward to it


  17. See 5377 in Strong’s. It defines the prime for “beguiled”…..which is Nasha: a prime root meaning to lead astray, to delude or to seduce.



Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s