“He that justifieth the wicked, and he that condemneth the just, even they both are abomination to the LORD.” – Proverbs 17:15
Some people have a real hard time interpreting clear passages like this…
“Then Judas, which had betrayed him, when he saw that he was condemned, repented himself, and brought again the thirty pieces of silver to the chief priests and elders, And he cast down the pieces of silver in the temple, Saying, I have sinned in that I have betrayed the innocent blood. And they said, What is that to us? see thou to that. and departed, and went and hanged himself.” – Matthew 27:5
Judas Iscariot is in hell. The fruit of genuine repentance last time I checked is not suicide. Judas repentance was not genuine repentance, he was merely grieved with the result of his action. Metamelomai is the Greek word for repent here. It simply means he was only remorseful for his actions. Had there been a true change the Greek would have used Metanoeo.
If you’ve watched Murray you’ve listened to him boldly assert that Judas Iscariot was an innocent man, that he truly repented and was killed by the Kenites for some obscure conspiratorial reason.
This represents a profound lack of spiritual discernment.
The reality is Judas Iscariot was a very evil man who witnessed the Son of God and all his miracles and betrayed him for 30 pieces of silver. This is just one more example of the depravity of Murray’s teaching. Consider this passage…
“While I was with them in the world, I kept them in thy name: those that thou gavest me I have kept, and none of them is lost, but the son of perdition; that the scripture might be fulfilled.” – John 17:12
The scripture is very clear: the context is talking about the disciples, the son of perdition is Judas Iscariot… Jesus is very clear, HE IS LOST.
But Murray responds that this passage is talking about Antichrist, or more specifically Satan himself.
This is simply one of the thousands of sad examples of how Arnold wrests the scripture according to his own perverse private interpretation. He sacrifices the truth on the altar of his religious fantasy.
He goes on to elaborate about the intergenerational Kenite conspiracy. Are you beginning to see a pattern here? Murray superimposes his false doctrine concerning the Kenite conspiracy over all of scripture from the beginning to end. But it’s all racist Christian Identity garbage.
But maybe Acts 1:8 proves the conspiracy?
“Now this man purchased a field with the reward of iniquity; and falling headlong, he burst asunder in the midst, and all his bowels gushed out.” – Acts 1:8
After a corpse hangs in a tree long enough it does what? Decomposes. Eventually Judas corpse fell from the tree and burst on the ground. If Peter wanted to tell us about the Kenite conspiracy he would have done it here and acquitted Judas. But apparently Murray knows something Peter doesn’t.
What was the reward of iniquity? 30 pieces of silver. What was Judas iniquity? The betrayal and murder of Christ. What became of the son of perdition? He went to hell!
THIS HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH KENITES!